Two things I came across on Friday brought to mind Mark Twain's much remarked upon quote:
Reports of my death are an exaggeration
On Friday I read this piece in the NY Times giving a roundup of the major announcements at this year's US Network Upfronts. In particular, it reported Network plans to both create and expand on strategies to link advertisers more closely with content.
One example was Turner Network's TVinContext:
Turner’s “TVinContext” initiative will look to place advertising content adjacent to relevant scenes. For example, a scene in the theatrical film Hitch in which actor Will Smith has an allergic reaction to something he ate would be followed immediately with a spot for the allergy medicine Zyrtec.
The fact that this (hardly new) strategy is being announced as the year's big innovation, gives you a sense of not just where Networks are at, but to a degree, clients and audiences as well. It's also interesting in that the 2008 Upfronts were dominated by discussions about branded content rather than contextual or integrated advertising.
Does this mean we're sliding backwards? More like sideways.
A few minutes later, I was reminded of this illuminating video from Peter Hirschberg's TED Talk on the future of TV and the internet (via avc.com)
Taking in these two things in quick succession, simply reminded me the pace of change is uneven and unpredictable, and that change is a process rather than an event.
1 comment:
evyerthing seems to take longer than people expect when it comes to television evolving. In this mini-thesis thingo I'm writing at the moment I've come across many articles and books plotting grand features. One said by the year 2000 we will be able to press the remote and manipulate a 3D representation of ourselves to mix and match outfits, make up and accessories. And that was only written about six years before 2000. hmmm wild predictions of man's imagination. I think we're developing of course, maybe not sideways, but two steps forward one step back, or just baby crawling. -from the mind of a kid
Post a Comment